Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 10:18:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I/O)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 77

Author Topic: Should sugary drinks and soda be taxed?  (Read 1414 times)
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« on: April 10, 2017, 03:19:28 PM »

As long as we are taxing luxuries,  why not tax organic foods, almond milk, coffee, tea, stevia, red meat, ice cream, butter, spices, makeup, birkenstock footwear, and deodorant? Hell why not special taxes on everything, or at least everything I dont do.

Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2017, 03:27:10 PM »


REJECT AZAZEL!
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2017, 03:56:08 PM »

As long as we are taxing luxuries,  why not tax organic foods, almond milk, coffee, tea, stevia, red meat, ice cream, butter, spices, makeup, birkenstock footwear, and deodorant? Hell why not special taxes on everything, or at least everything I dont do.



None of those things create negative externalities to the massive extent that soda consumption does

Organic food undermines cheap wholesome america inc food. Almonds drain water in cali. Coffee and tea are abysmal towards your stomache and bladder. Red meat causes global warming and heart disease. Ice cream is no different than soda. Butter has cholesterol. Some spices exploit local environments. Makeup is tested on animals. Birkenstick is made from animals.

The issue is patterns of consumption, not mere consumption itself. Drinking a pepsi has nowhere near the impact as eating a carton of Rocky road every week. It seems like the choice of which unhealthy thing to ban is decided purely upon cinvenience, not true weighting.

Plus I can never get behind one of thses taxes on "sugary drinks" where sugar free diet coke is taxed but not starbucks drinks with sugar. I often feel like those who want a tax on poor dumb sick people are just too afraid to say so.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2017, 10:58:59 AM »

Where does the Starbucks unicorn drink fall on the taxation spectrum?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.