SB 104-13: NPC Elections Visibility Act of 2021 (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 07:50:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 104-13: NPC Elections Visibility Act of 2021 (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 104-13: NPC Elections Visibility Act of 2021 (Passed)  (Read 2548 times)
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,739
« on: August 12, 2021, 09:26:50 PM »

If I may offer an opinion, and while I can't speak for Peanut, I feel a project of this sort - a worthwhile idea on its own - would not only require a deputy, but also changing the timing of NPC elections. Although being burnt out myself had much to do with RL, I have grown to believe having them take place each month is asking too much and adding too much pressure. The system would work better, I think, if we had them every two months, whether that is by extending the campaign period to last two months, or, preferably, taking a break each month to prevent player and GM exhaustion.

If there were steady breaks, it would probably become more feasible for the GM - and/or deputies - to spend more time on simulating governance.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,739
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2021, 09:40:12 PM »

If I may offer an opinion, and while I can't speak for Peanut, I feel a project of this sort - a worthwhile idea on its own - would not only require a deputy, but also changing the timing of NPC elections. Although being burnt out myself had much to do with RL, I have grown to believe having them take place each month is asking too much and adding too much pressure. The system would work better, I think, if we had them every two months, whether that is by extending the campaign period to last two months, or, preferably, taking a break each month to prevent player and GM exhaustion.

If there were steady breaks, it would probably become more feasible for the GM - and/or deputies - to spend more time on simulating governance.
I very much agree on both points, and your last point about governance could enrich the nature of Section III. Would an amendment to the schedule have to go through the regional legislature or could it be added as an amendment to this bill?

Regional legislatures set the timing, so they would have to authorize changing the schedule. I imagine that would have to be accomplished first before its included on this bill?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.