HB 26.15 No Subsidies for Fossil Fuels Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:18:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HB 26.15 No Subsidies for Fossil Fuels Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HB 26.15 No Subsidies for Fossil Fuels Act  (Read 2424 times)
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« on: November 20, 2020, 10:09:45 PM »

Maybe we could add to the bill that the amount of money from the abolished subsidies on hydrocarbon fuels should go to help low (and middle) income households pay for energy bills in the form of tax break or subsidy program on energy bills.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2020, 06:14:04 PM »

aye
The goal was to propose a reallocation and that does it. We could always tweak it afterwards if there are issues.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2020, 09:20:17 PM »

Quote
I guess the question is how much this is going to actually affect prices. If we're going to be forcing the energy sector belly-up, it would probably be good to have some kind of transition in place. If it's only going to move the needle a little bit (which I think is more likely) you probably don't need to do as much.

Wasn't there a law passed to take control of energy companies (red green deal)? With that it mind, it would be good for the state for the value of energy companies to go down. It would then cost much less for the state to buy a majority control.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2020, 05:01:10 PM »

Quote
I guess the question is how much this is going to actually affect prices. If we're going to be forcing the energy sector belly-up, it would probably be good to have some kind of transition in place. If it's only going to move the needle a little bit (which I think is more likely) you probably don't need to do as much.

Wasn't there a law passed to take control of energy companies (red green deal)? With that it mind, it would be good for the state for the value of energy companies to go down. It would then cost much less for the state to buy a majority control.

Does this bill have an impact on the value of energy companies ? I don't want the value to go higher since some energy companies will have a majority of public participation. If there is no impact, my questioning is not relevent. If the value goes down it will cost less to take control is some companies.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2021, 04:37:51 PM »

We adopted a reallocation of funds. I've accepted it but could go with different percentages, like 5-10% between categories.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2021, 09:24:04 PM »

I motion for a final vote.
It seems we are taking too much time, we adopted a reallocation of funds which was the main request, and there has not been amendment since.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,525
Canada


« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2021, 06:10:00 PM »

aye
we adopted a plan to give money back to help people.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.