Yeah well 47.47% or 47.54% at least it says, that % of folks didn't want the anointed one & the casual observer can be excused for noticing, that Obama didn't win the popular vote blow-out he had wished for, the first president since Woodrow Wilson to see his support decrease; also Romney did better than Dukakis in 1988, GHWB in 1992, Dole in 1996 (only Kerry in 2004, did marginally better) and McCain in '08; both percentage wise as well as the EV; the anointed one might have been re-elected, but nothing on the blow-out scale he was expecting; that must catch in a few craw's;
Dude stop trying. We all know that OFA was expecting a 2000-2004 style race. Only you guys in the right-wing media bubble were expecting 1980.
in terms of EV scoring, Obama only did better than Wilson, Truman, Carter and Dubya...not Mt. Rushmore territory is it?
In terms of Presidents running for re-election post-WWII, Obama did better than Truman, Ford, Carter, Bush 41 and Bush 43 EV wise. PV wise he beat Truman, Ford, Carter, Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43. Obama is the first Democrat to win a majority of the PV twice since FDR. He beat 55% of POTUS' in the PV and 46% EV.
What would be sweet Irony, is if Obama and Dubya are both at 50.73% each...yep those stats are a bitch!
Would be sweet irony. But it won't happen, because millions of ballots still have to be counted in Democratic states, so Romney will drop to 47 and Obama shall rise to 51. Let it go. Obama won, Romney and you guys lost. This "the anointed one" nonsense is just your way of being spiteful. But guess what, he is the "anointed one". He's been "anointed" POTUS by a majority of the people of the USA twice.