Which VP pick was worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 11:25:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which VP pick was worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Sarah Palin
 
#2
Carly Fiorina
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 128

Author Topic: Which VP pick was worse?  (Read 3031 times)
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« on: April 28, 2016, 12:39:20 PM »

Palin, because Fiorina at least sounds intelligent when she speaks.  Although I would argue that Dan Quayle was worse than either one.

What is it with female GOP running mates that liberals hate so much?  Is it simply because they're women?
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2016, 07:28:51 PM »

Palin was a gamechanger before she turned out to be an idiot. McCain surged into a dead-heat and she was very well-received at first.
Not just a dead-heat, but a lead.  McCain was winning in every national poll on the day that the financial crisis broke.  Much of that was probably a post-convention boost.  Although the announcement of Palin on the ticket certainly helped.

[/quote]
On paper, Palin was a great running mate for McCain, because she checked the boxes he was missing and shared a maverick streak and bipartisan credentials.
Since when does Palin have "bipartisan credentials?"
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 16 queries.