Am I the only one who thinks Strange wouldn't be much more electable than Moore? The guy basically screems "corrupt establishment".
I agree that Strange is a pretty bad candidate, but I think Strange is a slightly more electable general election candidate because "muh tax cuts" business Republicans would be okay with voting for him, while Moore may push these people toward sitting out or even voting for *insert here* Democrat.
Then again, Strange has given some pretty consistently unimpressive performances for an Alabama Republican even as other Alabama Republicans soared to elections (for example: Strange lost to Jim Folsom Jr. in 2006 for Lieutenant Governor even as Bob Riley won re-election by 15), and that was before the corruption angle popped up.