Are embedded congressional districts illegal? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 11:25:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Are embedded congressional districts illegal? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are embedded congressional districts illegal?  (Read 1767 times)
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« on: January 12, 2021, 12:17:48 AM »

No, and sometimes IMO they're a better option--it's better to put Valencia and Torrance County in a district with other suburbs of Albuquerque than split the region in three, for example.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2021, 03:27:51 PM »

From 1992 to 2002, the congressional map for Arizona had all of the Hopi reservation in AZ-03 and all of the Navajo reservation in AZ-06. The map was drawn that way because the two respective tribes did not want to be represented by the same congressman. This meant that the town of Moenkopi, Arizona, which is Hopi land and is surrounded on all four sides by Navajo land, was in AZ0-03 but was embedded within AZ-06.
Don't think that's so much of an embedded district as it is a completely noncontiguous district. Surprised that was allowed.

It isn't allowed--the Hopi reservation was linked to it by a narrow spit with no one living in it.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2021, 10:41:01 PM »

What a bizarre opinion.

What's your proposal for the Jacksonville area?
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2021, 03:28:50 PM »

What's also worth discussing: keeping cities whole. I can sort of buy the argument that the extremities have more in common with a city than with each other, particularly in cases where a metro area has certain quirky geographical tendencies or strong cultural divides--i.e. splitting Atlanta is probably better than donuting Atlanta, in a hypothetical world where that's possible.

However, there are lots of cases where different suburbs are decently interconnected and similar. In that case, often times the most distinctive divide you can find is the inner city vs. the suburbs. Essentially you're arguing that this:



is worse than this:
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2021, 04:09:39 PM »

I will say that on that Charlotte map it would probably be better to have the "city" district go all the way to the state border and the "suburbs" district wrap around only on the north side.

That's true, though I'm not sure exactly how that'd be really substantively different from a donut seat under Sev's critique.

IMO South Charlotte probably does belong in that 9th, though Pineville seems like a better fit with the 12th.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.