Urbanizing Suburbs and Towns (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 08:04:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Urbanizing Suburbs and Towns (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Urbanizing Suburbs and Towns  (Read 1393 times)
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,272
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« on: May 28, 2014, 05:17:05 PM »

What suburbs have begun to retrofit? I'm aware of some of those developments in Montco and NoVa, but where else? Do all of these increasingly urban places vote D?

What towns (i.e., not suburbs, but independent towns) are densifying? How do they vote?
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,272
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2014, 02:30:19 PM »

It is, yeah.  Smart growth people are in love with the Pacific Northwest.  MontCo and NoVa are, as mentioned, also excellent examples.  Maryland's been lagging behind a bit (thanks, PG), but I think the Purple Line should help improve on what's already been done.

I don't think Bloomington, MN is doing anything like this right now, but for various reasons they're not a bad candidate for doing so in the future, if the municipality can be convinced it's a good idea.  The only worry is really that there are still stretches of Minneapolis and St. Paul that aren't really urban, and with the Green Line just opening I think St. Paul is going to be in for a fun time in the near future.

Why is PG less friendly to such stuff? Is it a legacy of white flight?
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,272
Bosnia and Herzegovina


« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2014, 09:53:30 AM »

It is, yeah.  Smart growth people are in love with the Pacific Northwest.  MontCo and NoVa are, as mentioned, also excellent examples.  Maryland's been lagging behind a bit (thanks, PG), but I think the Purple Line should help improve on what's already been done.

I don't think Bloomington, MN is doing anything like this right now, but for various reasons they're not a bad candidate for doing so in the future, if the municipality can be convinced it's a good idea.  The only worry is really that there are still stretches of Minneapolis and St. Paul that aren't really urban, and with the Green Line just opening I think St. Paul is going to be in for a fun time in the near future.

Why is PG less friendly to such stuff? Is it a legacy of white flight?

Er, PG is about 65% black, so... Wink

Rather, it's just that the county government is incompetent, and has been for many decades.  (That might be indirectly the result of white-flight; like many majority-minority locations, PG has hardly seen any investment over the years from higher levels.)  It absolutely refuses to invest in intelligent growth, instead preferring the same large tracts of single-family homes far from transit that used to be the norm.  Single-family subdivisions don't sustain urbanization.   In a way, PG is more like everywhere else in the country; what needs to be explained is why Arlington (more than anywhere near DC), Montgomery (quite a bit), and Fairfax (to a surprising extent in recent times) have all been so good at investing in responsible growth.

What I meant was that it might have tried to stop white flight by discouraging urbanization and transit back in the late 20th century, unsuccessfully of course.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.