How would these 2006 senate races play out nationally? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 08:32:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  How would these 2006 senate races play out nationally? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would these 2006 senate races play out nationally?  (Read 7260 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: December 09, 2006, 03:33:29 PM »

If you make maps like these, be sure to put the winner of the Senate Race in winning their own state.

I disagree I think on nat'l level Talent beats McCaskill and Allen defeats Webb

What on Earth do you mean "on the national level"?  The voters in Missouri would be the exact same ones who gave McCaskill a 2% lead over Talent.  You don't get a new set of voters when you're voting for president.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2006, 09:50:10 PM »
« Edited: December 09, 2006, 09:51:43 PM by Gabu »

There is a difference between voting for Sen. McCaskill and Pres. McCaskill

Why would voters in Missouri want a Sen. McCaskill but then also want a Pres. Talent?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2006, 05:02:31 PM »

It's more like Sen. Democrat and Pres. Republican, this does make a difference

That does not even come close to answering my question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.