Family and Society (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 03:51:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Family and Society (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Family and Society  (Read 3675 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: May 24, 2005, 05:58:32 PM »

Aspects of the nontraditional family that are essential ingredients for poverty:

1. Head of household is a female, of any age
2. The head of household is a teenager, of either sex
3. The parents (one or two..or ) are high-school dropouts
4. English is not the first language spoken at home

Even if only one of these factors is present, then the family is nearly determined to be poor. Lack of income, parental dysfunction (drug/alcohol addiction, physical violence, absenteeism, etc.) are factors that make home life miserable, but not necessarily poor.

Uh, I don't understand the first ingredient.  My mother has always been the breadwinner in our family and she's been very successful at it.  I don't see why having the mother be the head of the household is an ingredient for poverty.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2005, 06:47:20 PM »

I thought I had meant sole head of household is a female of any age, but just in case...

I could go on to qualify myself further--an original two-parent household becoming a single-mother household through divorce, widowhood, separation and mutual hatred, etc.--but that seems to me to fall more under the "dysfunctional parents" catagory.

All the same, a woman, teenage or otherwise, who has a child with no intentions of including the father as a responsible parent (i.e., the "baby daddy") is almost condemning her child to poverty

My mother has been the sole head of the household since I was 12 or so; we haven't had any financial problems because of it.  I would agree that it is perhaps detrimental to the child's upbringing not to have a father figure to balance the mother (although it wasn't in my case), but I don't see how there's any correlation between the female being the head of the household and the family having financial troubles.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2005, 07:00:22 PM »

Yes, it's wrong to care about my freedom and the freedom of others. Wink

The correct way to go is to care about your freedom and to hell with everyone else's; just ask opebo.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.