Al, I'm making excellent arguments and no one is refuting them, merely acting outraged.
The extent to which an argument is excellent is measured by how many people are subsequently convinced of the validity of its conclusions; therefore, purely objectively speaking, your arguments are not excellent, but horrible beyond belief, as you have not only convinced no one at all, but you are also actively repelling any possiblity there might have been of one even considering your argument.
One point I noticed in particular:
You say...
Dave, calling sex 'wrong' under an arbitrarily defined age limit is ridiculous.
...and then you go on to say...
I would suggest 12 [as a universal age of consent].
What exactly makes 12 the magical number? Isn't that just as arbitrarily defined as 16?
