NixonNow v. Blerpiez, Round 3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 03:40:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NixonNow v. Blerpiez, Round 3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What is your opinion of Sec. King's decision?
#1
Completely agree with it
 
#2
Mostly agree with it
 
#3
Slightly agree with it
 
#4
Neutral
 
#5
Slightly disagree
 
#6
Mostly disagree
 
#7
Completely disagree
 
#8
File Articles of Impeachment
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: NixonNow v. Blerpiez, Round 3  (Read 1661 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: March 14, 2005, 10:22:26 PM »

Actually, there is legislation pertinent to what has happened, and it goes against King's unilateral invalidation of the results.  Here's an excerpt from the Statute of Election Procedures, Certification and Challenges:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The correct procedure is to bring it to the Supreme Court, who will then decide whether or not to invalidate the results.  If the results are not invalidated, then the correct procedure, again, is to bring the disputed vote(s) to the Supreme Court.  That's what the Supreme Court is there for.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.