Senate Bill: Pacific Crisis Stimulus Act (Enacted)

[Sec. of State Superique]

After taking a look at the SEDZI Act that Yankee asked GM Griffin to make a Report, I was thinking about that it would be better if we started the "Atlasian Works" program under the Pacific Region rather than creating a new bill of stimulus.

As the SEDZI Act has already passed into the Senate three years ago but was never put in place, it would take much less time if we just enact it now rather than standing with this legislative effort of another stimulus bill.

GM Griffin's estimates that the SEDZI would cost about 11 Billion Dollars and that would be a good amount of money for the Pacific Stimulus if we consider that bonds are also being bought by the FED and other measures may be taken by the Regional Government following the days after the Council and the Gubernatorial Recall.

[Sec. of State Superique]

Full implementation of SEDZI would work well as a supplement to the bulk of this bill, but $11 billion dollars is a relatively small sum of money and unlikely to stimulate demand sufficiently. I would prefer that we at least retain the payroll tax holiday as a part of this legislative package.

Oh sure, now I have seen that the whole stimulus would cost 371 billions!

[Sec. of State Superique]

Just to clarify (in case it was intrepreted differently):

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is what the projected deficit would be if this stimulus were passed.

That would be a huge deficit anyway. We shall see how are we are going to pay this huge stimulus!

[Sec. of State Superique]

Yankee,

The SEDZI Act mentioned a 5 year period!

I started with the Pacific because Griffin had already calculated the cost. I intend to set the SEDZI at the other regions as soon as Griffin ends the cost calculation and I also intend to take a look t other previous legislations that could work as stimulus!

[Sec. of State Superique]

I would recommend you to give the money of the Pacific Region to the Department of Internal Affairs. If the NM-AM wins, then I will directly spend the money dodging the Regional Government. If they are not elected to the Council or to the Governorship, the money will go freely to the Regional Government.

[Sec. of State Superique]

I would recommend you to give the money of the Pacific Region to the Department of Internal Affairs. If the NM-AM wins, then I will directly spend the money dodging the Regional Government. If they are not elected to the Council or to the Governorship, the money will go freely to the Regional Government.

Technically you get the money for every region. You mean let you distribute it in place of the Regional Gov't? 

Yes, but only for the Pacific Region.

[Sec. of State Superique]

I also have issues with considering the political views of regional officeholders in the process.

This is creating a bad precedent. So, next time a party has the president and a majority in Senate, they can refuse to send money to regions controled by another party?

I was just trying to create a solution based on what you were debating...