District Court, Splitting 2-1, Finds Texas Congressional Districts Violate VRA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:11:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  District Court, Splitting 2-1, Finds Texas Congressional Districts Violate VRA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: District Court, Splitting 2-1, Finds Texas Congressional Districts Violate VRA  (Read 7909 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: March 14, 2017, 06:00:18 PM »

This is crazy 8 years after Texas's current Congressional Map was made its ruled unconstitutional. Couldn't this ruling have come sooner? The current map will come up for revision in 2021 for the 2022 mid-terms.

I wish we could just do redistricting by a computer program designed to do correct congressional redistricting without gerrymandering.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2017, 06:02:31 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2017, 06:04:38 PM by hopper »

Honestly, we should just get rid of the VRA district requirements *and* partisan gerrymandering. Draw compact districts like Elections Canada does and then every party can let the chips fall where they may. Compete for votes, make voters actually like you. Gerrymandering, IMO, is why both parties are so widely reviled these days.
That could easily lead to African Americans in the South being completely drawn out of power.  Its not hard to draw compact districts which destroy their representation.  
I'm sure African Americans would still have representation in the Atlanta, Georgia area though even without VRA though. TN-9 which is based in Memphis, TN would probably still be there too which is a VRA district.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2017, 06:05:11 PM »

This is crazy 8 years after Texas's current Congressional Map was made its ruled unconstitutional. Couldn't this ruling have come sooner? The current map will come up for revision in 2021 for the 2022 mid-terms.

I wish we could just do redistricting by a computer program designed to do correct congressional redistricting without gerrymandering.

Who gets to define "correct redistricting"?

Without gerrymandering.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2017, 06:22:06 PM »

This is crazy 8 years after Texas's current Congressional Map was made its ruled unconstitutional. Couldn't this ruling have come sooner? The current map will come up for revision in 2021 for the 2022 mid-terms.

I wish we could just do redistricting by a computer program designed to do correct congressional redistricting without gerrymandering.

Who gets to define "correct redistricting"?

Without gerrymandering.

Who decides what is a gerrymander and what is not? Opinions on this differ from person to person.

MI and IL congressional maps are gerrymander-lites. PA and OH Congressional Maps are messy gerrymanders. MD-06 is a gerrymander no doubt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.