Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 04:30:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing  (Read 11464 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: December 03, 2016, 03:33:53 PM »

Again the election is over. The Dems are really going out of their out of their way to embarrass themselves.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2016, 01:22:20 PM »

All Russian hacking talk is strictly non-election rigging stuff right? As in they selectively hacked and leaked info, but didn't engage in actual vote manipulation to directly affect the outcome.

This is a key point.  Actual vote-count affecting hacking is worthy of thorough investigations.  Luckily we've seen no evidence of that so far.

Russians throwing their voice into the cacophonous noise of an election...meh, so what?  Is there something inherently threatening about Russian fake news than say, John Harwood's fake news?

But all of this talk has a sub-text of elitism that is so typical of the left.  "Voters are too stupid and easily swayed by Russian propaganda...therefore we must discredit or possibly overturn the election, because we're smart and the sheeple are dumb."  Well, remember the videos circulating of the Obama voters who thought dumb things (he's gonna pay my rent...from his 'stash')?  Did even one Republican suggest we need to get information to the electoral college about how so many Obama voters got misinformed in '08?

This whole line of thinking is poisonous.  Democrat projection ("Republicans won't accept legitimate election results!  Horrors!") all over again.

So, the Russians hacked the DNC and the RNC. They only aired the DNC's dirty laundry. Trump is going to nominate Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State.

You're saying all of this doesn't bother you, am I getting that right?
So they aired the DNC's dirty laundry that was in October and Dems didn't seem to care then. Why care now? Because  they lost the election that's why.

I am not for the Tillerson nomination but Trump is the President-Elect he can nominate who he wants for Secretary Of State.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2016, 01:24:16 PM »
« Edited: December 13, 2016, 01:29:02 PM by hopper »

While I want to honor Clinton's request to enter the Trump Presidency with an open mind, the man is making it harder to do that every day. If I was an elector, I honestly think I would write in Kasich at this point. The actual EC should do the same.

Good thing you're not an elector, then.
If the liberals wanted Romney, they had a chance to vote for Romney 4 years ago.
The thing is a Romney Presidency would be a lot less scarier to Liberals than a Trump Presidency is going to be for them. For example, if a top-two tier election happened(which it won't)  between Romney and Trump liberals would go for Romney.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2016, 01:38:24 PM »

There are now 29 electors who want an intelligence briefing....but Suprun is still the only Republican among them:

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/electoral-college-members-intel-briefing-232554

There needs to be only 30 Electoral Defections for another redo of the 2016 Presidential Election in 2017 or 2018 right?

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.