2016 GOP platform becomes MORE socially conservative, calls for ban on all Porn (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:24:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  2016 GOP platform becomes MORE socially conservative, calls for ban on all Porn (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016 GOP platform becomes MORE socially conservative, calls for ban on all Porn  (Read 4344 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: July 14, 2016, 03:23:21 AM »

This platform is another dagger in my chances to become Republican again. Does anyone know how to change your actual username since I'm not a Republican anymore?
Nobody even reads the platform on election day. From what I have heard the Dem platform have shifted left and the GOP platform has shifted more right though I think. There is basically "no middle" anymore. I think the GOP Platform kind of pedaled away from LBGT issues or wasn't contraversal in that area.

As for the "porn" issue is anybody gonna vote on that issue on election day? I don't think so.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2016, 03:47:07 AM »

I feel like Trump is a porn watcher, honestly.
I just kinda laughed when I read that.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2016, 03:56:44 AM »

And just this minute, they adopted the following amendment change:

"Children raised in a traditional two-parent household tend to be physically and emotionally healthier, less likely to use drugs and alcohol, engage in crime or become pregnant outside of marriage"

So much for trying not to further alienate minorities
Well children do better in a two-parent household than a single-parent household.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2016, 11:22:24 AM »

And just this minute, they adopted the following amendment change:

"Children raised in a traditional two-parent household tend to be physically and emotionally healthier, less likely to use drugs and alcohol, engage in crime or become pregnant outside of marriage"

So much for trying not to further alienate minorities
Well children do better in a two-parent household than a single-parent household.
You're overlooking what they mean by "traditional".

Also, I wonder what groups of people in particular that line targets.
I do stand by my previous statement mostly. I do think however a same-sex couple is capable of raising a child as well as a heterosexual couple is. I think the word traditional should be struck out though. Thinks for catching the traditional part which I overlooked as you said.



Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.