State Trends 2000-2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 06:13:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  State Trends 2000-2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: State Trends 2000-2012  (Read 5858 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: January 08, 2013, 07:41:58 PM »

Should do a 2008-2012 map.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2013, 07:46:10 PM »
« Edited: January 08, 2013, 08:38:05 PM by hopper »

The change in the margins of victory relative to popular vote between 2000 and 2012. All data is from this site's archives.

90% shading = 20 point or more gain in margin
70% shading = 10-20 point gain in margin
50% shading = 5-10 point gain in margin
30% shading = 1-5 point gain in margin
Grey = <1 gain in margin

I'm not quite sure why most states are trending Democratic despite adjusting for the popular vote of election year.  The average gain in margin is 1.2% for the democrats.  It may be because some of the largest D-trending states have 3 or 4 EVs (Vermont, Hawaii, Montana, Alaska), scewing the results of this.  Also, keep in mind that the vote is still being counted and Obama's margin is likely to go up, which would shift the relative margins accordingly.

Democrats gained (relative to the popular vote) each election in Vermont, Colorado, Virginia, North Carolina, California, Washington, Texas and Iowa.  Republicans did this in West Virginia, Tennesee, Kentucky and Missouri.

I'm suspicious of Connecticut, the Atlas says Obama won by 3%, which is very different than other websites say and doesn't make any sense given its margins in previous years.

Arizona, Alaska, and Montana really surprised me!

New York, New Jersey, Michigan and Connecticut didn't move it all. I guess those states are as Dem as they can get in terms of a vote floor. Mississippi swinging Dem is a surprise too. Montana swinging Dem as much as did is a pleasent surprise too but the state has had 2 Dem Star Politicians in Schweitzer and Tester since the mid 2000's come into high office.  Same thing with Alaska but they don't have any Dem politicians on the level of a Schweitzer or even  a Tester.

Whats up with Texas swinging Dem?
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2013, 08:36:52 PM »
« Edited: January 08, 2013, 08:44:59 PM by hopper »

Swing/Trend from 2004 to 2012:



Red = Trend Dem
Green = Swing Dem, trend GOP
Blue = Swing GOP
Mississippi trending D is a shock. SC must be trending D very lightly if it is trending D. Ditto the same with Idaho.

Maine trending GOP is a shock too.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.