Clinton: Polls Showing Sanders Could Beat Trump "Mean Nothing To Me" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 08:02:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton: Polls Showing Sanders Could Beat Trump "Mean Nothing To Me" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton: Polls Showing Sanders Could Beat Trump "Mean Nothing To Me"  (Read 1591 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,763
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« on: May 22, 2016, 05:26:15 PM »

This is the kind of attitude that might make her loose the election. Does she not know that this condescending tone just turns off Bernie voters from considering her?

What is she supposed to say? "Yes, he may be the stronger candidate?"

First you guys accuse Hillary of telling lies. Now she tells the truth and she's not being tactful enough. Some of these Sanders folks are so entitled, seriously. He lost. Hillary owes him nothing. And if it hurts your feelings when she assesses the situation honestly, it beats me how Bernbots could ever expect to actually face Trump from a position of strength.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,763
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2016, 06:22:45 PM »

This is the kind of attitude that might make her loose the election. Does she not know that this condescending tone just turns off Bernie voters from considering her?

What is she supposed to say? "Yes, he may be the stronger candidate?"

First you guys accuse Hillary of telling lies. Now she tells the truth and she's not being tactful enough. Some of these Sanders folks are so entitled, seriously. He lost. Hillary owes him nothing. And if it hurts your feelings when she assesses the situation honestly, it beats me how Bernbots could ever expect to actually face Trump from a position of strength.

Sanders has a base of support, whether Hillary and her team of establishment muppets like it or not. When she was in a similar position, she got State. What is she offering Bernie and his supporters? The same thing she's getting from them right now: a raised finger.

Um, pardon me, but Hillary's eventual nomination to State was not public knowledge in the April before the election. Roll Eyes

There very well could be some kind of offers extended. But let's keep it in perspective a bit: Hillary Clinton was a serious candidate with gravitas who kept the race close through almost the entirety of the 2008 primaries. Any other candidate in Bernie's position would have dropped out two months ago. He has been beaten.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,763
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2016, 06:35:34 PM »

Oh I know, I'm not saying she needs to right now.  Just that I want to see it.  I'm hungry for some good old fashioned Clinton war games, the inclusive mother-bird Hillary is boring.

Lately I've been wondering what the fallout would be if she literally said "f-ck you" to Trump's face. Honestly, I see few downsides.

Imagine if, at the first debate, Trump straight-up calls her an enabler and woman-hater for being angry at her husband's mistresses.

"I've only said this to one other person: my husband. It was in a moment of real anguish. I cannot explain the feelings of betrayal and anger I felt when I found out my husband had been cheating on me and disrespecting me the way he was. I hope no one has to feel that, but those women who have sadly been in the same situation know exactly what I mean. And for you, Donald Trump, womanizer extraordinaire, to stand here and lecture me for simply having these feelings...  I'll say it again: F-ck you. You would be an insult to the office of the presidency."

BOOM.

One can dream. Purple heart
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,763
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2016, 06:40:19 PM »

Oh I know, I'm not saying she needs to right now.  Just that I want to see it.  I'm hungry for some good old fashioned Clinton war games, the inclusive mother-bird Hillary is boring.

Lately I've been wondering what the fallout would be if she literally said "f-ck you" to Trump's face. Honestly, I see few downsides.

Imagine if, at the first debate, Trump straight-up calls her an enabler and woman-hater for being angry at her husband's mistresses.

"I've only said this to one other person: my husband. It was in a moment of real anguish. I cannot explain the feelings of betrayal and anger I felt when I found out my husband had been cheating on me and disrespecting me the way he was. I hope no one has to feel that, but those women who have sadly been in the same situation know exactly what I mean. And for you, Donald Trump, womanizer extraordinaire, to stand here and lecture me for simply having these feelings...  I'll say it again: F-ck you. You would be an insult to the office of the presidency."

BOOM.

One can dream. Purple heart

I think we've seen enough of crazy angry Hillary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC4Pvm6Oj4A

You are this dopey?

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.