Greenland election 2013 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 22, 2024, 09:50:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Greenland election 2013 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Greenland election 2013  (Read 5908 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« on: March 16, 2013, 04:13:32 PM »

Even in Greenland its a bit surprising with only 4 out of 31 seats going to Liberal and Conservative parties (I consider Atassut to be Conservatives). Atassut, once the second largest party in Greenland, looks doomed.
I wonder at what point we will see a viable Centre-Right alternative to IA and Siumut. Of course it depends on the countrys economic progress, but what is your guess? Maybe 15-20 years?
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2013, 07:19:03 AM »
« Edited: March 17, 2013, 07:22:52 AM by politicus »

Even in Greenland its a bit surprising with only 4 out of 31 seats going to Liberal and Conservative parties (I consider Atassut to be Conservatives). Atassut, once the second largest party in Greenland, looks doomed.
I wonder at what point we will see a viable Centre-Right alternative to IA and Siumut. Of course it depends on the countrys economic progress, but what is your guess? Maybe 15-20 years?


You could argue that the opening of Greenland to development by both IA and Siumut is a fairly right-wing move despite their left-wing platforms. That was the main issue in the election, and what actually surprises me is the lack of a left-wing anti-development party.
In a Greenlandic context nationalism, and thus economic independence from Denmark, is closely connected to leftism. Which is why IA accepted such lucrative terms for Big Mining, since they are more nationalist than Siumut. No Greenlanders are anti-development as such, its a matter of who gets what and how much centralization in Nuuk there needs to be.
What is considered left or right is also a matter of perspective. IA transformed the major government owned businesses into profitable companies by rationalizing and laying off workers. Is that left wing = securing public ownership of the most important means of production or right wing = the state behaving like any other capitalist. I would say left wing, but it is debatable.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2013, 01:12:05 PM »

Ideologically this is a left-center-right coalition, just like the former government. The only difference is that the more centrist party is the biggest this time, but since Kleist made IA pretty centrist, thats not much of a difference. I am not sure this "unnaturally" broad coalition thing is healthy for Greenland. It tends to blur things too much.

With perhaps 25% primarily Danish speaking people in Greenland (as Ingemann pointed out, many Inuit Danish speakers say they are bilingual because it is more "appropriate") the language thing is bad news. Its not very democratic to ignore such a large minority. Hammond seems to be as nationalist as Hans Enoksen on this one. I am surprised Atassut has accepted that. But they are probably worried they will become completely irrelevant if they stay out of the new government.

Uranium extraction is problematic as well, but to be expected.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.