The Solid South was really bad for Southern presidential politics (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 02:52:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  The Solid South was really bad for Southern presidential politics (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Solid South was really bad for Southern presidential politics  (Read 5688 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« on: August 05, 2012, 04:49:40 PM »

Your figure is right, but it needs an asterik:

Woodrow Wilson was born in Virginia,  raised in the Confederacy, and concidered himself a Southerner, despite running from New Jersey.

Yes, but I was talking about home states, not birth states. He had his political base in New Jersey, where he lived for a quite long time. I can't see Governor Wilson of Virginia going to the White House.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

By this definition you can also include states like Kentucky, Delaware or even Maryland. I'm focusing on the former Confederacy.
Which is an analytical mistake, the cultural South is a wider region and more relevant.
Ranking of "Southerness" for the border states.

1. Missouri
2. Kentucky
3. Oklahoma
4. Maryland
5. Delaware

What makes you think Wilson couldnt have won based in Virginia? He was perceived as a Southerner during the campaign. Being from NJ didnt change that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.