Why did McGovern lose so badly? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 05:45:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Why did McGovern lose so badly? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did McGovern lose so badly?  (Read 20386 times)
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


« on: August 13, 2004, 06:59:23 PM »

To get back to the topic...
1. The Democrats failed to nominate their strongest candidate that year.
2. The Republicans took some underhanded steps to assure that the Democrats did not nominate their strongest candidate (although it might have happened anyway).
3. The Democratic convention that year was a disorganized, uncontrolled mess that turned off voters (and was, along with the '68 convention, one of the main reasons that subseqent conventions were tightly scripted).
4. McGovern didn't get to give his acceptance speech until 4 in the morning, so very few people heard it.
5. The Vice-Presidential nomination was a debacle, with McGovern offering it to a number of people who turned it down, only to have it accepted by Eagleton, who had to be de-nominated (another debacle).
6. The visits to China and Russia and the sham "peace" agreement Kissinger patched together in Vietnam had Nixon riding high.
7. Nixon refused to debate McGovern.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.