Possible Western military response to Syrian chemical weapons use (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:31:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Possible Western military response to Syrian chemical weapons use (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Possible Western military response to Syrian chemical weapons use  (Read 10084 times)
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« on: August 28, 2013, 06:21:57 PM »

We have far more pressing matters to attend to at home.

So, Americans are more important than Syrians?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2013, 07:26:43 PM »

Last time I checked, the Cripps aren't bombing villages with chemical weapons. Not to say gangs in America aren't a problem, but problems in the US are nowhere near other parts of the world.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2013, 05:15:52 PM »

Last time I checked, the Cripps aren't bombing villages with chemical weapons. Not to say gangs in America aren't a problem, but problems in the US are nowhere near other parts of the world.

So why exactly should America fix a problem that we did not create? Why should we solve their problems? America is NOT the policeman of the world, contrary to what the neocons say?

The world needs a police force. It shouldn't just be the US though.

But, we should intervene, not because we created the problem, but because we are in the best position to solve it. That's called compassion. Libertarians such as yourself wouldn't know what that's about though.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2013, 05:34:42 PM »

Last time I checked, the Cripps aren't bombing villages with chemical weapons. Not to say gangs in America aren't a problem, but problems in the US are nowhere near other parts of the world.

So why exactly should America fix a problem that we did not create? Why should we solve their problems? America is NOT the policeman of the world, contrary to what the neocons say?

The world needs a police force. It shouldn't just be the US though.

But, we should intervene, not because we created the problem, but because we are in the best position to solve it. That's called compassion. Libertarians such as yourself wouldn't know what that's about though.
Well, if your balls are that big and you have so much compassion why don’t YOU go to Syria and enlist in the FSA? They are taking foreign volunteers.

I'm afraid lack of military-orientation would ensure I would be a burden on their organization.  Plus you know, I have a family to worry about/provide for. Luckily there are plenty of military-oriented people in the world who are best suited for intervening in this conflict.

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2013, 09:57:41 AM »

Surprised Canada is staying put. The Harper government has been very pro-military. I guess they figure it would be rather unpopular here.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2013, 12:40:43 PM »

Surprised Canada is staying put. The Harper government has been very pro-military. I guess they figure it would be rather unpopular here.

If it ends up being just cruise missile strikes as has been speculated, does Canada even have any?

Just did a quick google search: the answer is no.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2013, 03:01:25 PM »


Yes, people getting gassed is soooo funny Roll Eyes
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,032
Canada


WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2013, 06:29:41 PM »


Yes, people getting gassed is soooo funny Roll Eyes

Your take on when Saddam Hussein gassed his own people?

Didn't the US bomb Iraq after that (in the 1990s)? And didn't Saddam get rid of his WMDs?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.