There's Ebola in the US now, so all other nations should stop accepting any flights or ships from the US as well, even if it's transporting goods and not a passenger plane (the pilot could always be infected). Let's crash the global economy, to stop the spread of Ebola.
That doesn't compare at all and you know it. Don't be dishonest.
So does anyone have any actual
reasons why we shouldn't have a travel ban on majorly affected nations? Or just more ad hominem and deflection?
I hate to sound like this but the majorly affected nations are also kind of economically easier to have this kind of policy with. It's not like we're restricting travel with China or India or anything.
