UT-04/Mason-Dixon: Matheson in a tough fight for new seat (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:47:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 House Election Polls
  UT-04/Mason-Dixon: Matheson in a tough fight for new seat (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UT-04/Mason-Dixon: Matheson in a tough fight for new seat  (Read 3767 times)
Svensson
NVTownsend
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 630


« on: April 12, 2012, 09:00:55 PM »

I'm rather curious to see if this honestly ends up the point at which Utah goes straight red for the first time in twelve years.
Logged
Svensson
NVTownsend
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 630


« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 09:21:31 PM »

Oh, as a sidenote, I want Sandstrom to win purely by virtue of his having an amazing name.
Logged
Svensson
NVTownsend
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 630


« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2012, 04:52:05 PM »

First, I want to thank JohnnyLongtorso, for taking an interest in my state's politics. It seems nobody cares about Utah politics (even most Utahns).

I'm in favor of none of them, since I think Matheson is essentially a republican-in-democrat clothing (as I call him), and of course the GOP candidates are all crazy (except maybe Mia Love, and even she's far too conservative for me).

I'm thinking Mia Love will eventually get the GOP nomination, simply because she has none of the negatives Wimmer and Sandstrom have (they're unacceptable to Salt Lake County for attempts at school vouchers and criminalizing miscarriage shenanigans, among others), and if she gets the nomination, she will probably have a good chance against Matheson.

I live in this district, but I honestly don't care who wins, since none of them will adequately represent me. I think I'll vote for the Justice Party guy running, because I frankly can't stand Matheson.
 

A vote for the Justice party is essentially a vote for the Republican candidate in much the same way that a vote for Ralph Nader in 2000 was essentially a vote for George W. Bush.

Well, it's not as though Pioneer didn't have a point. A vote for Matheson is a vote for the Republican Party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.