Atomic bombings of Japan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 03:35:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Atomic bombings of Japan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which would you have supported?
#1
Hiroshima
 
#2
Nagasaki
 
#3
Neither
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Atomic bombings of Japan  (Read 3837 times)
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


« on: May 07, 2006, 12:56:12 PM »

I think bombing both was the correct thing to do. It brought the war to a quick end and probably saved many American soldiers who would have been lost had we attempted an invasion. Its possible that conventional bombing might have worked too. Our bombing raids created firestorms that caused enormous damage. Maybe that would have eventually forced the Japanese to surrender as well, but not as quickly as the A-bombs.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.