Will Democrats ever be happy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 04:21:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Will Democrats ever be happy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will Democrats ever be happy?  (Read 3377 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« on: August 21, 2005, 06:58:34 PM »

The Exit Plan's been well defined.

1) Remove Saddam - Done

2) Secure Iraq - Succeeding

3) Transfer Power - Done

4) Hold Elections - Done

5) Write Constitution - Almost Done

6) Hold Elections - Planned

7) Wear down Insurgency - Succeeding

8 ) Train Iraqi Soldiers - Succeeding

9) Remove most soldiers - Planned
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2005, 10:26:23 PM »

On the subject of tranining troops. When Iraq fell apart, there were no more troops left. America has spent the last almost two years training, equipping, recruiting, and deploying a brand new army complete with new officers, NCOs, and average ground pounders. I doubt anyone could build such an army faster than we are with a civil war raging all around you and a country that has been torn apart. Even considering that, we've trained tens of thousands of troops, with more being trained every day. Iraq is not an "easy" job. War never is. Course, we could always follow Cindy Sheehan's exit strategy - "Pull out immediately and hope they don't start fighting each other." That'd be a hell of alot easier, right? Tongue
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2005, 08:15:37 PM »

Donald Rumsfeld is the single biggest impediment to victory in Iraq though he will never be replaced because Bush doesn't want to lose face to the far-left crowd.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2005, 10:27:15 PM »

Donald Rumsfeld is the single biggest impediment to victory in Iraq though he will never be replaced because Bush doesn't want to lose face to the far-left crowd.

You may be right.  I have my doubts about Rumsfeld.  It seems his theories on how many troops would be needed were wildly optimistic.  He was probably wildly optimistic about other things as well.

Mostly his micromanagement of the fighting, though also his failure to plan for an exit for Iraq before the fighting began.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.