Proposed Modification to Family Planning Amendments Act of 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 01:20:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Proposed Modification to Family Planning Amendments Act of 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Proposed Modification to Family Planning Amendments Act of 2004  (Read 6127 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« on: January 19, 2005, 02:25:50 AM »

Scrap the whole bill.  It is utter trash proposed by a pro-abortionist and approved by the most radically left wing senate we've had.  I call on my senators to scrap this entire bill.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2005, 10:03:34 AM »

Take away c and d if you must, but leave a and b.

We are setting a very dangerous precedent if we repeal the whole thing. Nothing will get done if every time the Senate switches hands, all that gets done is a repeal of bills passed by the past Senate.

Because all the real Congress does is repeal bills.  I think B should be left, but A should go if we are to pass Supersoulty's Bill.  It isn't an anti-abortion thing, it is just that I don't think money should go overseas, when we need it at home.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2005, 10:19:37 PM »


Family Planning Amendments Act of 2004

It shall be the stated policy of the Forum that:
(a) funds for the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) shall be restored to their FY 2001 level.
(b) no organization receiving federal funding for family planning services domestically or abroad shall be prohibited from mentioning the full range of reproductive options, including abortion, to their clientele on pain of federal support.
(c) no funds shall be made available through the CHIP program for the care of zygotes, blastocysts, embryos, or fetuses as described by regulation as an "unborn child".
(d) no law shall be construed to punish someone for an attack on a pregnant woman in such a way as to treat the act against the zygote, blastocyst, embryo, or fetus as a separate offense.


Passed by the Third Congress of the A.F.F. (September 25, 2004)
Presented to the President on October 16, 2004
Entered into law after 7 days with no executive action.


I think it is still this.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2005, 11:27:06 PM »

Yes and no.
Subsection (d) would clearly repeal any such federal law, but no such law is on the books, altho the Unborn Victims of Violence Act has passed the US House the past few Congresses, and if the Senate were to pass it, I'm certain Bush would sign it.

Um, it was passed by the Senate on March 25, 2004 by a vote of 61-38. Bush signed it into law on April 1, 2004.

Our country diverged from real life in February, so there is no UVVA.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.