The Proportional Representation Act is garbage (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 09:05:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Proportional Representation Act is garbage (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Proportional Representation Act is garbage  (Read 929 times)
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,219
United States


« on: April 22, 2014, 05:24:44 PM »

This does seem like an unreasonably short amount of time for a special election. Perhaps we could change "regularly scheduled election" to "session"?

I apologize for any confusion and craziness caused by my unexpected attempt at absconding, and for my failure to account for this previously - I probably would not have run in the special election if I had remembered my exams started when they did.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,219
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2014, 07:30:24 PM »

I still think our big problem here is that a senator wants to hold onto his job while missing a month of work. Am I the only one who thinks it's kind of BS that a senator can resign as senator after he's won re-election and then get automatically rehired when the term turns over? A resignation symbolizes that you are no longer interested in serving. If Barack Obama had resigned on November 10th, 2012 after winning re-election, he would not have expected to ascend to the office again on January 20th, 2013. I mean, I know people get busy... but if someone is going to be missing entire months at a time, to me, they should maybe rethink being a senator.

Rather than resigning or taking a leave of absence, can't you just make an effort to take half an hour out of your studying to check up on things here? When I was a senator and had exams, I would always warn that I might miss some things, but usually I ended up checking in anyway just because it's impossible to study 24/7.

I'm not intending to take a LOA for "months at a time", it'd be two weeks, give or take a few days. I could serve out the remainder of my extra-super-special term as a compromise and then take the LOA, missing out the first two weeks of my term and then serving to the best of my ability for the other 87.5% of it. I suppose I could also make an effort to keep a (relatively) significant presence on the forum during that time, but I feel I wouldn't be up to snuff if I were to do that.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,219
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2014, 11:12:30 PM »

I don't think we've ever had a potential vacancy after an election but before a swearing in. I'm currently leaning towards finishing up this term like normal and then taking a normal leave of absence afterwards, FYI.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,219
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2014, 05:15:55 PM »

I don't think parties should have the power to fill seats either to be honest.

If there's not sufficient time to organize and hold a special election, I think the parties would be good at selecting a caretaker Senator that holds similar views to the other Senator. Perhaps we could let a Senator designate his or her successor if he or she resigns or is impeached?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.