SENATE BILL: The Public means Public Act (Redraft Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:36:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Public means Public Act (Redraft Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Public means Public Act (Redraft Law'd)  (Read 12542 times)
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #25 on: May 30, 2014, 10:06:33 PM »

It's not "all over", it's only in the ME/MW/PA, and it wouldn't be if they enacted IDS/NE-style housing laws.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2014, 11:23:04 AM »

It's not "all over", it's only in the ME/MW/PA, and it wouldn't be if they enacted IDS/NE-style housing laws.

Didn't you need to offer another amendment regarding your previous one's use of the word clause instead of section. I would recommend moving the clause in that case to maybe create a third section on applicability staying the above do not apply those regions that done X.

If I said "Sections 1 and 2 do not apply to the IDS/NE", wouldn't that invalidate the whole bill for the IDS and NE? I think what everyone is calling "sections" here are more like clauses. I would be willing, however, to introduce an amendment to that effect (perhaps taking out the hateful parts of the bill, putting them in their own section, and then saying that section doesn't apply to  the IDS/NE)?
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #27 on: June 01, 2014, 07:52:24 PM »

It's not "all over", it's only in the ME/MW/PA, and it wouldn't be if they enacted IDS/NE-style housing laws.

Didn't you need to offer another amendment regarding your previous one's use of the word clause instead of section. I would recommend moving the clause in that case to maybe create a third section on applicability staying the above do not apply those regions that done X.

If I said "Sections 1 and 2 do not apply to the IDS/NE", wouldn't that invalidate the whole bill for the IDS and NE? I think what everyone is calling "sections" here are more like clauses. I would be willing, however, to introduce an amendment to that effect (perhaps taking out the hateful parts of the bill, putting them in their own section, and then saying that section doesn't apply to  the IDS/NE)?

Okay now I am confused. Tongue Clauses 1 and 2 are the worst in my view if they are not limited, but the President also has issues with Section 2 so reorganization of the bill might be in order. I think.

What are you considering a section and what a clause herE?

Original text:


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The things labeled "Section 1", "Section 2", etc. are sections. The little numbered points in them are clauses. My amendment limited clauses 1 and 2 of section 1 to the MW/ME/PA to mollify you folks.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2014, 07:20:51 PM »

Thx bby u no ily 5ever
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2014, 05:06:57 AM »

Should we have a vote or do some people still have concerns?
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #30 on: June 21, 2014, 01:12:21 PM »

Aye.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #31 on: June 25, 2014, 05:19:59 PM »

I can't say I like what the President has done to this bill and I'd rather just have DemPGH pass it, so unless convinced otherwise I'll be voting no on the redraft in order to introduce it under a more favorable administration..
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #32 on: June 28, 2014, 07:12:53 PM »

Motion to vote on the redraft.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


« Reply #33 on: July 01, 2014, 09:55:10 AM »

Nay.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 10 queries.