Office of Former President and Gov. DemPGH

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

What about three men who all marry each other? Or five men and seven women who are all married in a giant love dodecahedron?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

So are you endorsing separate but equal? Or are you endorsing polyamorous civil unions (though I'm sure you're up on the status of marriage at the federal level)?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

So are you endorsing separate but equal? Or are you endorsing polyamorous civil unions (though I'm sure you're up on the status of marriage at the federal level)?

No. I'm saying, polygamy is the conjugal version of "right to work."

As in?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

So are you endorsing separate but equal? Or are you endorsing polyamorous civil unions (though I'm sure you're up on the status of marriage at the federal level)?

No. I'm saying, polygamy is the conjugal version of "right to work."

As in?

It gives advantage to the person who can collect spouses! Marriage is economic. It always has been.

I don't care who has a threesome, foursome, or fivesome, though. Whatever. Have fun, if that's your thing. Although I disagree with you on CHIMPS since they are a DIFFERENT SPECIES. Emphasis on SPECIES. 

This isn't about collecting spouses unless you want it to be - what if all three people are married to each other?

And I never said I supported chimpanzee-human marriage at the current moment. I simply said that, if a chimp and a human were to give informed consent to marry each other, I would support their union. I, personally, am not a speciesist.