Which Senators do you think will retire in 2016? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 30, 2024, 05:39:20 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)

Which Senators do you think will retire in 2016? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Which Senators do you think will retire in 2016?

#1 Richard Shelby (AL), 82		31 (47%)
#2 Lisa Murkowski (AK), 59		3 (4.5%)
#3 John McCain (AZ), 80		18 (27.3%)
#4 John Boozman (AR), 65		6 (9.1%)
#5 Barbara Boxer (CA), 75		41 (62.1%)
#6 Richard Blumenthal (CT), 70		3 (4.5%)
#7 Marco Rubio (FL), 45		2 (3%)
#8 Johnny Isakson (GA), 71		7 (10.6%)
#9 Mike Crapo (ID), 65		2 (3%)
#10 Dan Coats (IN), 73		12 (18.2%)
#11 Chuck Grassley (IA), 83		22 (33.3%)
#12 Jerry Moran (KS), 62		0 (0%)
#13 Rand Paul (KY), 53		12 (18.2%)
#14 Barbara Mikulski (MD), 80		53 (80.3%)
#15 Roy Blunt (MO), 66		0 (0%)
#16 Harry Reid (NV), 76		11 (16.7%)
#17 Chuck Schumer (NY), 65		1 (1.5%)
#18 Richard Burr (NC), 60		0 (0%)
#19 John Hoeven (ND), 59		0 (0%)
#20 Rob Portman (OH), 60		0 (0%)
#21 Ron Wyden (OR), 67		0 (0%)
#22 Patrick Leahy (VT), 76		23 (34.8%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 66

Calculate results by number of options selected

Author

Topic: Which Senators do you think will retire in 2016? (Read 6027 times)

Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon

Posts: 12,283

Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Re: Which Senators do you think will retire in 2016?

« on: November 28, 2014, 12:24:19 AM »

Chuck Grassley has been a doddering, confused old coot for the better part of a decade or so. Needs to go.

Democrats ought to pressure Barbara Mikulski to retire because if she doesn't in 2016 and were to do so in 2022, they'd have to defend an open seat in an off-year election. They can't seem to count on Maryland with non-presidential turnout.

Rand Paul is going to have to choose between the Senate and the White House. He might as well pull the trigger and go big in 2016. Kentucky certainly has nothing to gain from him gaining any more seniority since his very ideology precludes him from using his seniority to get things for his state.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 14 queries.