Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 11:30:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860?  (Read 12782 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: September 14, 2014, 09:22:23 AM »

New Orleans was the closest thing to a "Northern" city in the sense that it was (for the era) decently sized and had a considerable number of immigrants coming and going. And that was because it is a port city. Notice that Charleston and Mobile, also ports, are high up on the list.

Urban growth requires a commerce and industry based economy, and the South's agrarian economy had little need for cities bigger than what most of them were. There was also the weather factor.

I wouldn't have bothered adding Dallas to that list, not only because of how laughably small it was but because it really wasn't a Southern city at that time. They were still frontier folk defending themselves from Indian raids up in that part of Texas at the time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.