I'm sure the first class passengers on the Titanic had similar thoughts about the steerage as well, Grumps and IndyTexas.
It's public transportation done in the most shoddy, nickle and dimey way... and every time the airlines make it worse for the customers... the Gumps and IndyTexases come out and complain
"WHY CAN'T THEY JUST BE PERFECT LIKE ME AND ACT AS IF THEY FLY ALL THE TIME"
If it's so easy... then why doesn't it ever work that way? And if it's so easy... why aren't you flying an airline that requires such smooth behavior in order to operate?
No no no... they want her money just as much as they want yours.
I was on your side IndyTX until I read what actually happened. And what it sounds like is someone who was flying that isn't used to flying and probably doesn't fly often because it's mostly unaffordable to her... had to fly for whatever reason. And she wasn't expecting to have to start throwing around $100 to please a miserable gate attendant (I mean.. if this girl 'should've could've and would've'... the gate attendant, having had to deal with people like this all the time, could've had the compassion to say "just please put the purse in the bag before you get on the plane".
HOW DARE SHE HAVE TO FLY WITHOUT HAVING TONS OF EXTRA MONEY TO DISH OUT ON THE FLY?
Now there's a rich white people problem. Not understanding why people don't just have a hundred dollars to throw around... to bring a f**king purse into an airplane.
Get over yourselves first, then get over this.
So now it's a "class warfare" issue? What if it had been a wealthy woman in first class complaining about not being allowed on the plane with three bags?
There are many corporations and industries deserving of scorn in this country, but the commercial airline industry isn't one of them. These are people who have been providing a service thanks to capital investments that have generated a worse rate of return than any other business - in most countries, the government has to pony up money for unprofitable public goods; here, it's inevitably some investor who is convinced that "this time it's going to be different."
How about if you own up to your red avatar and have some sympathy for the worker in this situation? Airline employees deal with people at their absolute worst on a daily basis and have somehow managed to be one of those rare islands of large-scale private industry where employees are not completely walked all over. Most of the money in your airfare is going to the sheer amount of jet fuel it takes to get a large steel machine to get off the ground and stay off the ground long enough to get you where you're going. As physics suggest, the best way to reduce the amount of jet fuel needed to do that - and keep your fare from being higher - is by discouraging people from behaving in ways that contribute to the weight of the plane - like bringing lots of luggage. Why should a person with only one bag pay the same amount as a person who chose to bring three? Wouldn't it make more sense for the person with three bags to bear the cost of those extra ones via a fee than to make both of them pay more?
As the article stated, the rolling bag was too big and needed to be checked. If this girl wants to get mad at someone, she should get mad at her brother and sister-in-law for ditching her and leaving her with a bag that they should have checked and didn't.
How would the gate attendant know that the purse was originally in her other bag or that it even fit in her other bag? Is it really her job to advise people on ways to arrange their luggage such that they reduce the amount of revenue their airline brings in?
Whether she flies often or not, she handled the situation poorly. You know what the carry-on rules are when you buy your ticket. A 22 year old should not be yelling and crying over a luggage misunderstanding.