Republicans - what is your plan for staying competitive in the following states (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 11:48:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Republicans - what is your plan for staying competitive in the following states (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republicans - what is your plan for staying competitive in the following states  (Read 6089 times)
Indy Texas 🇺🇦🇵🇸
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,285
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: December 18, 2013, 12:20:21 AM »

Adopt the Canadian Tories approach to winning over minorities:

1)Accept that Hispanics generally don't go for abortion/gay marriage social conservatism and adopt a "family first" approach. This would include lots of rhetoric about small business, hard working families, and insinuating that the Democrats are patronizing elitists.

2) Adopt big government conservatism with lots of targeted tax credits and allowances. Ex: Child care allowances. This meshes well with the rhetoric in #1.

3) Not sure how feasible this is in the American system, but adopt a much more disciplined communications strategy. Adopt a unified, disciplined message and stick to it. Try to avoid Akin moments.

1) Rhetoric about hard working families? What kind of rhetoric? Talking about your party's cutting funding from the public schools their children attend? Or about reducing general revenue contributions to state universities, resulting in high tuition that those families often cannot afford? Or about treating the "evil public sector union workers" like pinatas when the reality is that a lot of Hispanics - particularly Hispanic women - would not be middle class were it not for their county and municipal government jobs. (What other job opportunities do you think there are for Latinas in rural South/West Texas?)

2) The people who write checks to the GOP are not your kind of conservative, Al. They don't care about "strengthening families." Only the useful idiots in the heartland care about that. The GOP's donors care about one thing - ensuring they pay as little tax as humanly possible. And the only way to do that is to "broaden the base and lower/flatten the rates" which means fewer deductions (which they will call "loopholes") and not more. Mitt Romney's 47% comment more or less cemented the belief that Republicans hate and disdain people who do not pay net federal income tax, and your suggestion would only increase the number of people in this category.

3) Not sure what to do about that. Todd Akin was only saying what he really felt and that is the problem. You could stop nominating people like him, but the sort of people who vote in GOP primaries tend to feel the same way he does.
Logged
Indy Texas 🇺🇦🇵🇸
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,285
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 01:34:10 PM »

They have no other option than to figure out a way to make themselves competitive in "big" states (>20 EVs). The only one they are guaranteed to win anymore is Texas. The only one they could reach for winning is Florida. But when they decided in the '90s to push forward with right-wing social issues positions and a hardcore anti-tax mentality, they gave up Illinois and California, which had been easily winnable for them up to that point. All they got out of this strategy was the short-term gain of barely winning two elections in the 2000s.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.