Section V is on the ropes (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:51:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Section V is on the ropes (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Section V is on the ropes  (Read 6492 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: February 28, 2013, 09:19:28 PM »

My reasoning may be flawed, but I would think that any state that voted for Obama would not need to use the VRA to create African American majority-minority districts because white racists in the state are obviously outweighed by people willing to vote for a black president.

Well Obama didn't win any of the states that are fully required to obtain preclearance for redistricting except Virginia (Florida only requires preclearance for part of the state). And considering their reactionary state legislature just attempted to gerrymander its electoral vote apportionment, I'm not sure we can trust them to their own devices.

One thing I've never understood is why Arizona is required to pre-clear. There are barely any black people there to disenfranchise, and there certainly weren't any when the law was passed. Was there some sort of discrimination against Hispanics going on there?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.