This is the problem with the argument against Obama. His opponents seem to be talking out of both sides of their mouths.
In one breath they say Obama's sweeping changes have drastically changed the foundation of our country, while in the next breath they say he didn't accomplish any of his campaign promises.
So what is he - a tyrant or a do-nothing president?
Wait, where's the contradiction?
1. "Obama's sweeping changes have drastically changed the foundation of our country."
2. "He didn't accomplish any of his campaign promises (except the one he made to drastically change the foundation of our country)."
He said he would "fundamentally transform this country". He did.
He said he would make lots of good things happen. He didn't.
No contradiction at all.