Mueller report thread - Mueller testimony July 24

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Not the report mind you, the Dem reaction.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Not the report mind you, the Dem reaction.

What reaction? I haven't seen the report yet.

Anticipating the reaction...in the future. Did I really need to explain that?

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Not the report mind you, the Dem reaction.

And what will you do if this doesn't get Trump reelected? Nevermind, I'm afraid to ask. Lol.

lol that you think I want Trump to be re-elected.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

The reeling and conspiracy theory is delicious.

Also, LOL

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

This is free speech.  He said "I could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and my poll numbers wouldn't go down!" It was obviously in jest and not a threat.  If he said "I will shoot someone" well that's a threat and would have to be looked into and would've I believe.

Trump jokes a lot but people seem to want to take him seriously word-for-word anyway.

Barr and Nadler/House Dems are obviously going to spin this. There's no reason to base any inference on what they say. Their words are all meaningless.

There is no reason to take any spin other than the actual report itself. That is where the fight is headed. Try to keep up.

I don't think this is going to sway very many people either way because few people care. Democrats have been making the mistake of thinking that this will somehow to lead to a deus ex machina removal of Trump. But obviously that's wrong and will continue to be wrong no matter what the report says. Shooting someone on fifth avenue, etc.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

It may not be "exonerating" for Trump, but clearly Democrats should focus on something else in the 2020 election.

Yeah. Like 2024.

Trump spent the past week attacking a dead man. Believing, 2020 is the end of his presidency.

Smart Dems will move on from this nonsense and concentrate on getting an electable candidate for 2020.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

This is free speech.  He said "I could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and my poll numbers wouldn't go down!" It was obviously in jest and not a threat.  If he said "I will shoot someone" well that's a threat and would have to be looked into and would've I believe.

Trump jokes a lot but people seem to want to take him seriously word-for-word anyway.

Barr and Nadler/House Dems are obviously going to spin this. There's no reason to base any inference on what they say. Their words are all meaningless.

There is no reason to take any spin other than the actual report itself. That is where the fight is headed. Try to keep up.

I don't think this is going to sway very many people either way because few people care. Democrats have been making the mistake of thinking that this will somehow to lead to a deus ex machina removal of Trump. But obviously that's wrong and will continue to be wrong no matter what the report says. Shooting someone on fifth avenue, etc.

I'm pretty sure you misread what he said.

He was clearly saying that even if Trump was found guilty of something, his supporters wouldn't care, and he cited Trump's "5th Avenue" comment as an example of why they wouldn't care.

Ok, that wasn't clear but yes probably a good portion of them would blow it off.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Donald Trump just won re-election.

That depends on whether Russia decides to help him again or not, now doesn't it?

But given how useful he's been to Putin, and how he and the GOP have refused to secure our elections, you're probably right that Russia will once again hand him victory.

Where was this collusion in the 2018 midterms?

Why is Russia ready to start Vietnam 2 in Venezuela? 

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/russian-air-force-planes-land-in-venezuela-carrying-troops-report-1.7047639

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

TOTAL EXONERATION!!!

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1133753691796889601

Democrats need to insert that sentence into every commercial for 2020.

The whole point of stating it that way, is because if it were to go to court - Trump would win.  The "burden of proof" would not be met.