Would Clinton have been a better president? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 01:07:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Would Clinton have been a better president? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Clinton have been a better president?  (Read 4230 times)
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


« on: October 14, 2017, 09:51:53 PM »

There is no doubt she would have been more effective (especially when it comes to foreign policy). Whether you think that makes a good president is up to you.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2017, 02:38:24 PM »

She'd be a better President in the same sense that dying from a gunshot to the head is better than a knife to the gut.

If you don’t believe that the difference would be night and day, regardless of politics, then you need to pay more attention.

It wouldn't be night and day because congress would still largely be gridlocked. I bet the GOP would drag their feet on several cabinet nominees.

Our standing internationally alone would make the difference night and day.

Yup.

I think people are really underestimating how much damage Trump has done to US global standing and soft power.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.