Axelrod: no answer to Ohio early numbers

[heatmaster]

Axelrod, saying "Well see who's bluffing" is false bravado and suggests, that Obama and company know that Romney and the Republicans are outpacing Dems in Ohio, game on and Dems trying to spin what is occurring is pitiful.

[heatmaster]

This response, is to be expected from a Democratic supporter, the blind leading the blind and all I saw was false bravado from Axelrod, and the best response he could come up with, "We'll see who's bluffing"; why no response to why the Dems are down from there 2008 totals? All I head was crickets and silence; Axelrod stuck for words, now I know there are desperate days for Team Obama.

[heatmaster]

So how come you have Romney drawing larger crowds? How come the Republicans have a 10% enthusiasm advantage? Or does that count? Also Dems absentee ballot's are down 154,911 from 2008, and Republicans are up by 108,000, that's a swing of 263,000 and as you know Obama won Ohio by 262,264 votes in 2008; Axelrod says Romney was bluffing and claims that the Obama campaign are dealing with facts; well he's ignoring the facts he was presented with and went off on his talking points spin, what gives; if you deny false bravado, be my guest: but Romney has data which can't be ignored, Axelrod knows this, as he and Obama have access to the same data, but they are ignoring the stubborn facts, talk about suffering from denials.

[heatmaster]

The 47% unaffiliated you refer to, are Independents and as you know Romney has been leading with Independents and rarely do incumbents win without Indy's; you ignore the southern part of the state, Evangelicals and tea party supporter's are pulling in behind Romney; you also ignore Coal country, these voters don't like Obama and if your side can "persuade" them not to vote and do what they did in 2008, sit out the election - be my guest: what about those pesky women who don't buy into the herd mentality: Obama's lead is not that strong with that group: I know I'm being nasty citing these facts: Maybe you can offset these developments, but your base is not as motivated as you were four years ago. What about Obama only managing 48% in most polls? Not a recipe for success; somebody will be right and somebody will be wrong on Election Night.

[heatmaster]

So 47% unaffiliated are actually secret Democrats; you cite 29% Dems and 23% Republicans; I presume this is early voters: so 47% would be Independents, they are "unaffiliated" . Independents are not affiliated; you are blowing smoke; you are ignoring the absentee ballots, Republicans are up by 108, 000 voters, while Dems are down by 154,911 votes, that's a swing of 263,000 in favor of Republicans; Obama won by 262, 244 votes in 2008; this data is not suspect as you so desperately hoping it was. But I'm happy to wait until Tuesday, and we will both know who's right and who's wrong.

[heatmaster]

Sbane, Gravis Marketing and Anvi are typical Dems, intolerant with those who don't  buy into there idiotic theories and outright fantasies; guys you can't get me banned from this sight, but give it your best shot and bring it on!; All waffle and hot air! I'll voice my opinion and stick my oar in regarding the narrative, which is advantageous to the anointed one.

[heatmaster]

Apologies Anvi, just going on the trends for Absentee ballots, and those trends are down for Dems and up for Republicans; as for the make up of unaffiliated voters, I'm not sure of the make-up of this group, if they are composed of Indys, Dems. or Republicans; Romney is in Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania tomorrow by the way.