I'm no supporter of Kamala Harris, and admittedly I just skimmed the article but I do think there is some sense in going after the parents of children that chronically miss school. It doesn't seem to me like that's on par with the things going on at the border.
It's not a big deal at all. Almost every state charges parents for truancy. This is just a zoomed-in attack on Harris that's a big fat nothing-burger.
Just because every state does something doesn't make it right.
Still doesn't justify zooming in on Harris for following it. Honestly, nobody will care about this. It's normal.
The reason people are "zooming in" on Harris for this is because she is running for president. When you run for president, you ought to expect people to scrutinize your record. Democrats have a right to say they don't support this statist BS that apparently "almost every state" does, and adjust their opinions of Harris accordingly.
If you truly think this is disqualifying, and it is common, there should be an effort to eradicate all who have done this from the political scene. It should be made certain that no President will appoint any prosecutor who did what Harris did to a court or to the Justice Department or to any Cabinet/ Sub-Cabinet office.
Unless people are willing to go that far, this is largely trumped up.