I said no in back in 2012.
I say yes today.
I agree with this mostly. I thought no until as late as March 2014, but then seeing everything she is doing and everything she is saying, I believe she will run. That said, I still would not be surprised if she ends up not running.
I am still not sold on her chances if she does run. I do not think she is a shoo-in for either the nomination and certainly not the general. The Republicans have a good crop of names being mentioned it sounds like and there are still several other good, if not better, Democrats being talked about.
Do you seriously consider the names Bush and Paul "good"?
The name "Bush" is nowhere near as toxic as it was several years ago. This is because the Obama administration has been such a disaster that the Bush name has been redeemed in a sense. To be true, the name "Obama" is worse than the name "Bush" right now. (I voted for Obama twice, and even I think he's been a disaster especially in the second term).
I think your perspective may be a tad skewed due to the fact that you're from Oklahoma, the most anti-Obama state in the country, and supported Bush.
Polls agree with the guy from Oklahoma.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/index/262706/speedreads-obama-is-less-competent-than-george-bush-say-a-plurality-of-americanshttp://www.inquisitr.com/1037005/george-w-bush-popularity-beats-obamas-approval-rating-in-2013/http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/06/12/george-w-bush-gallup-poll-approval-ratings/2414365/
Poll
