1824 Party Caucuses (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 08:54:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1824 Party Caucuses (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Yo yo yo!
#1
National Caucus: President DeWitt Clinton of New York		  
#2
National Caucus: Vice President John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts		  
#3
National Caucus: Speaker of the House Henry Clay of Kentucky		  
#4
National Caucus: Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush of Pennsylvania		  
#5
Republican Caucus: Former Governor William Clark of Illinois		  
#6
Republican Caucus: Former Vice President Albert Gallatin of Pennsylvania		  
#7
Republican Caucus: Senator Nathaniel Macon of North Carolina		  
#8
Republican Caucus: Former Congressman John C. Calhoun of South Carolina		  
#9
Republican Caucus: Senator Martin Van Buren of New York		  
#10
Republican Caucus: Senator Martin Van Buren of New York		  
#11
Republican Caucus: Senator William H. Crawford of Georgia		  
#12
Republican Caucus: Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: 1824 Party Caucuses  (Read 3341 times)
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« on: October 25, 2013, 11:06:33 PM »

Rally around Clay!
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2013, 12:21:02 PM »
Jeeze, if this is going to be Adams vs Van Bueren I'm going to be so depressed Unsure
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2013, 01:45:29 PM »
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 12:58:24 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 12:21:02 PM
Jeeze, if this is going to be Adams vs Van Bueren I'm going to be so depressed Unsure

Don't worry, Clark and Van Buren are tied.

Nope.  Van Buren is on there twice...
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2013, 01:46:13 PM »
Of course, it looks like Clay just got 2 votes, so I'm not depressed anymore Wink
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2013, 08:21:40 PM »
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 04:57:11 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 01:45:29 PM
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 12:58:24 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 12:21:02 PM
Jeeze, if this is going to be Adams vs Van Bueren I'm going to be so depressed Unsure

Don't worry, Clark and Van Buren are tied.

Nope.  Van Buren is on there twice...

I assume the votes for both Van Burens count toward his total. It's not like Van Buren 1 gets 3 votes, Van Buren 2 gets 4 votes, and Clark gets 5 votes and the win (I hope).

Also Claymentum and Calhounmentum!

Yeah, but at the time you posted that, it meant Van Buren was actually winning Tongue
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2013, 10:18:12 PM »
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 09:55:03 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 08:21:40 PM
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 04:57:11 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 01:45:29 PM
Quote from: Master at Arms Alfred F. Jones on October 27, 2013, 12:58:24 PM
Quote from: OAM on October 27, 2013, 12:21:02 PM
Jeeze, if this is going to be Adams vs Van Bueren I'm going to be so depressed Unsure

Don't worry, Clark and Van Buren are tied.

Nope.  Van Buren is on there twice...

I assume the votes for both Van Burens count toward his total. It's not like Van Buren 1 gets 3 votes, Van Buren 2 gets 4 votes, and Clark gets 5 votes and the win (I hope).

Also Claymentum and Calhounmentum!

Yeah, but at the time you posted that, it meant Van Buren was actually winning Tongue

It doesn't matter. If there's a runoff with the Nationals I'll vote for Clay, but I kinda want to see Adams be president twice just to make the presidents list even weirder.

I'm just pointing out your statement was incorrect when you said it because my OCD demands it.  I'm not referring to the eventual outcome in any way Tongue
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2013, 10:39:34 PM »
Making it like the real 1824, a 4 way, would be fun too.  I almost have to remind myself that just 2 parties would be unusual for this year.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.