Cameron Parish, LA is a disgusting place. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:50:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Cameron Parish, LA is a disgusting place. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cameron Parish, LA is a disgusting place.  (Read 14736 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« on: November 20, 2008, 06:19:54 PM »

It's ethnic voting as much as it's racist voting. I don't think that Landrieu would do nearly so well there if she didn't have a French surname.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2008, 08:49:13 PM »

Moral indignation at voting patterns is all well and good, but it gets very tiresome very quickly, especially when there's no context or real understanding of the area in question.

I'll now repeat this;

It's ethnic voting as much as it's racist voting. I don't think that Landrieu would do nearly so well there if she didn't have a French surname.

With some fun from the census... 35.2% of people here claimed either French or French Canadian ancestry. The only other large group is "American"... 17.7%. Only about 80% of people actually put down an ancestry; of those about 45% claimed French or French Canadian ancestry.

I can't find the percentage that's still Francophone (and it's a little late at night for it to be worth the bother) but it's definitely over 10%.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2008, 08:05:21 PM »



% vote, David Duke (runoff, 1991).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2008, 07:06:45 PM »


I must say, it's quite interesting that you say Landrieu having a French surname is why she did so much better than Obama in Louisiana (something I somewhat agree with) and then go on to use 1991 as further proof. What? A Klansman against a 3/4 Cajun man (who was the first Catholic Governor of Louisana in a long time)? Sorry, but Cajun Country voting for Edwards over Duke really doesn't prove anything.

Fine; here's the 1990 Senate election:



% David Duke (again). Note that the Democrat in this election was from Shreveport and had an obviously Scottish name (Bennett Johnston).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2008, 08:20:33 PM »

That's better. But it's still a white versus white race.

More importantly it was a race between a fairly conservative white Democrat versus an openly and viciously racist Republican. Balking at voting for a black man is one thing, voting for the former head of the Klan is quite another.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.