Society. Lovely. No thanks.
If you reject the idea that certain rules of decency, acceptable behavior and so on should be made by society, then you are either arguing for anarchy or a dictatorship. Which?
Thuggish protests outside
funerals are merely "uncomfortable"?
You're worried about an expression of exasperation?
I've made no comment on the financial penalty involved in this case. I'm just arguing that people who organise thuggish protests outside funerals should be prevented from doing so.
I think it has something to do with the intimidation of the electorate being seen as a bad thing.