People's Referendum Amendment [Failed] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 07:45:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  People's Referendum Amendment [Failed] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: People's Referendum Amendment [Failed]  (Read 8695 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« on: August 12, 2007, 06:33:48 AM »

Nay
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2007, 09:11:02 AM »

Nay
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2007, 08:07:32 PM »

Nay
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2007, 10:11:42 AM »

I might have voted for the original Amendment (despite my misgivings about that style of politics, the possibility of more involvement from the population as a whole might, just might, have been able to swing my vote. Not that it would have mattered), but I'm not voting for a piece Regional Fetish legislation.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2007, 11:34:01 AM »

Whilest we've seen a rise in population recently, we still see a continuous decline in regional activity.

True. And not a surprise. Regional politics reminds me of the sort of petty politics seen between small businesses on the chambers of commerce (or other such bodies) in small towns. That people aren't too keen to get involved with that sort of thing should be no surprise.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I disagree with this. It might be what the regions should be doing (and, incidentally, I'm as much in favour of devolution (in theory) in Atlasia as I am in the real world) but it's certainly not what they actually are doing... in practice the main role of the regions seems to be to act as a block to almost all reform. I don't see why giving the regions even more power in that area (they have far too much already) helps anything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.