Democrats Seem to be Targeting 6 States (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 09:44:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democrats Seem to be Targeting 6 States (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats Seem to be Targeting 6 States  (Read 11110 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« on: January 29, 2004, 10:22:32 AM »

If AR, TN, MO and LA and "very strongly Republican" then I'm a donkey.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If Toomey upsets Specter the PAGOP will have blown their brains out.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2004, 10:33:24 AM »

Very Strongly Leaning?
Er... unusual phrase there...

Arkansas is more likely to go Dem than NH.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2004, 10:50:14 AM »

Gore publically distanced himself from Clinton and refused to have anything to do with him in the campaign, costing him a state he thought he would win easily.
He was not seen as Clinton's VP, had he been he would have won AR and would be sitting in the White House now.

NH seems to have swung to the right recently, and Vermont may be returning to it's old ways now that Dean is over the hill.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2004, 11:01:16 AM »

I would have thought that Vermont's old ways would have been kinda obvious...
Vermont's old ways=GOP

On the second question, I don't know who the Dem nominee is yet, etc.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2004, 11:11:18 AM »

Why?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2004, 02:35:19 PM »

Some fact's about Vermont.

Bernie Sanders is re-elected every 2 years, because he is an excellent constituancy Representative, not because he is a Socialist.
Like plenty of rural areas, Vermont habitually vote splits.

The Governer of VT is a Republican, as is the State House.

One of it's Senator's is a Democrat, the other is an Independent, who was elected as a Republican.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2004, 04:07:55 PM »

Burlington is left wing (and is a stronghold of the Progressive Party) and Central VT leans Dem nowadays, but the rest of the state is Yankee Republican (like NH).
VT as a whole is not left wing, but is certainly exceedingly bloody minded and if Dean isn't on the ticket will be very hard to predict.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2004, 10:18:26 AM »

It would only take a 4.9% swing for Bush to pick VT up.
I'm not saying he will, what I am saying is that if turnout is low in Burlington, The Dems might be in trouble in VT.

Most states could go either way... this isn't to say will but that they might.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,914
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2004, 09:00:24 AM »

If CA split into North California and South California, I would guess that North California would be almost a Western version of Massachusetts, while a South California would be a tossup state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.