Liberty v Security (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 03:13:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Liberty v Security (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are security measures justified to the extent that civil liberties can be sacrificed?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
No Opinion
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Liberty v Security  (Read 2823 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« on: August 09, 2005, 03:32:03 AM »

I don't really think that any civil liberties are being threatend; at least not for ordinary citizens.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2005, 03:21:13 PM »


But of course Smiley

I should have added "none of the new stuff threatens the civil liberties of ordinary citizens". Not as much as the terrorists do anyway.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2005, 07:40:54 AM »

Damn Reichstag burning terrorists. Oh, wait, wrong script.

Have you gone entirely insane?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2005, 03:38:45 AM »

Where exactly were all the "human rights" lawyers during the miners strike? Y'know when the Government was really threatening and taking away people's civil liberties, using violence as a form of "policing", spying on ordinary citizens for no good reason, filling the NUM with moles and spies from the top down and generally acting like a petty third world dictatorship?

</rant>
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2005, 03:53:59 AM »

Oh before anyone gets the wrong idea, I think the Human Rights act is good idea, I don't support the Government prying into every little detail of people's lives, I think that Dracula Howard's recent remarks are flat out insane... you get the idea.
I also think that *sometimes* the civil liberties of the nation as a whole need to be put before the civil liberties of certain individuals* and that a lot of the hand ringing about civil liberties from human rights groups is hypocritical and counterproductive; after all which is a greater infringement of civil liberties... being locked up in Belmarsh w/o trial etc. or being sent back to a country where you will also be locked up w/o trial etc. but will probably get treated inhumanly and tortured as well. I didn't especially *like* the former and I think it's worrying that things had come to that, but I cannot see how the latter is in any way better. And no, the Government cannot allow the people in question to walk around freely; to let them do so is ultimately an infringement of the civil liberties of everyone else.

*I use public transport a lot...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2005, 04:03:52 AM »

" and "palestinian" is the same word as "philistine",

I've known *that* since I was about 12 Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2005, 04:20:09 AM »


Yep Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Words can be odd like that. Know where "Appalachians" comes from?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.