England local elections, May 2015 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 10:21:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  England local elections, May 2015 (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: England local elections, May 2015  (Read 15001 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #25 on: May 30, 2015, 07:26:57 PM »



Leicestershire. Usual comments about split wards etc.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #26 on: June 01, 2015, 01:10:49 PM »



Essex. Usual comments etc.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2015, 07:16:06 PM »



And the many districts of post 74 Lancashire. Usual comments, and in some districts there were odd nomination patterns.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #28 on: June 05, 2015, 01:57:35 PM »
« Edited: June 05, 2015, 03:47:37 PM by Sibboleth »



North Yorkshire with Teesside (most of which is historically part of the North Riding. The map is fairly clear as to which bit isn't). Again, some weird nomination patterns in places which is less than helpful. Also worth noting that Labour underperformed in York due to a rather unpopular local administration, and that (again this concerns Labour) there were weird goings on in the East Cleveland part of Redcar & Cleveland due to factional infighting and mass deselections.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #29 on: June 08, 2015, 01:46:55 PM »



Lincolnshire. I will note (again) that unusual nominations patterns were a thing in some places. And as is always the way with Lincolnshire, explanation is needed for the Deepings: the poll in Market Deeping was postponed (I will edit the map when the vacancy is filled), three candidates (all from different parties) stood for three seats in Deeping St James: I've coloured it red as Phil Dilks generally tops the poll in contested elections there. There's also a two seat ward in West Lindsey that had one Independent and one Tory and no one else. I've coloured it blue.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #30 on: June 12, 2015, 12:17:42 PM »



Post-1974 Cheshire. Note that Warrington proper and Widnes are both historically in Lancashire.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #31 on: June 16, 2015, 02:14:16 PM »



Split wards treated in the usual manner. On this point, an oddity: Labour took the second seat in split wards in Warwickshire districts (of which there were a lot) an oddly high proportion of the time.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #32 on: June 29, 2015, 12:15:52 PM »

Worcestershire:



Usual treatment of split wards etc. Most of them were in Kiddy (because of course). If you feel a need to map the map less awful, you could note that most of the wards in Worcester City and Redditch that did not vote are usually Labour. But that would only barely help...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2015, 11:31:14 AM »



Split wards treated in the usual manner (and there are lot of split wards so be really careful in some places). Weirdo nomination patterns in places as well: such fun. There were a couple of unopposed split wards in Eden district: Kirkby Stephen has been coloured blue, the ward in Penrith yellow.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2015, 01:33:23 PM »

Tyne & Wear:



Sure the election might have sucked nationally, but Labour won Fulwell ward lmao.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2015, 07:51:43 PM »



Nottinghamshire. Usual treatment of split wards etc.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2015, 05:59:06 PM »

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2015, 06:17:26 PM »



Though be warned: there are a lot of patterns in Birmingham local elections that don't show up in General Elections and vice versa. Even when they are held on the same day.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #38 on: September 25, 2015, 05:50:29 PM »

Though be warned: there are a lot of patterns in Birmingham local elections that don't show up in General Elections and vice versa. Even when they are held on the same day.

Bartley Green?  Perry Barr?

Those are the two most notable/extreme examples, yes.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #39 on: September 25, 2015, 07:10:56 PM »
« Edited: September 25, 2015, 07:13:09 PM by Sibboleth »

Dudley council covers much more than just Dudley town. I spent polling day here, in Stourbridge. Anyway:


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #40 on: September 25, 2015, 07:12:26 PM »

And also elections to the Sandwell Volkskammer:


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #41 on: October 04, 2015, 08:50:00 AM »

One of the wackiest boroughs in the country now...




As well as the eponymous Black Country town (and some other smaller Black Country towns), Walsall borough includes much humdrum white Birmingham suburbia. See if you can spot from the maps which is which!

Note also that some of the wards where UKIP did not run a candidate they would likely have polled decently. I don't understand either. It would appear (lmao) that the Greens benefited mildly from this.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #42 on: October 06, 2015, 07:11:02 PM »


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #43 on: November 10, 2015, 06:59:22 PM »


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,829
United Kingdom


« Reply #44 on: November 11, 2015, 01:54:31 PM »

To an extent almost certainly, but of more importance is the fact that this is Walsall. TUSC there = the latest rebranding of Citizen Dave's weird political cult.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.