UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 02:58:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12
Author Topic: UK General Election - May 7th 2015  (Read 277531 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #50 on: August 11, 2014, 07:48:55 PM »

Polls like that are trash. You people all read too many newspaper columns.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #51 on: August 12, 2014, 10:38:28 AM »

Yes I... cannot quite believe that he actually said that. This is not an affluent area by any means, even if it isn't culturally working class.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #52 on: August 21, 2014, 11:30:48 AM »

Constituency polling is basically junk, so, you know. But Itchen is a potential worry for Labour given the tiny majority and the retirement of Denham who, don't forget, has been the Labour candidate there since 1983.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #53 on: August 25, 2014, 10:51:02 AM »

Trying to 'project' seat results from poll internals (!!!!) is only marginally less stupid than trying to project from local election results.

Of course the latter is very common and has been for decades because most people who follow British elections obsessively are basically halfwits with calculators.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #54 on: August 25, 2014, 10:53:07 AM »

Regarding Ceredigion, forget that it contains two universities and remember instead that it is an agricultural constituency in Mid Wales...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #55 on: August 25, 2014, 11:48:35 AM »

Rhondda in 2001 remains the funniest instance to date, I think.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #56 on: August 26, 2014, 11:19:56 AM »


Two reasons. The main one was that the local (Labour) council had a poor reputation and was embroiled in various scandals (including a really bad one over a waste tip). There were local elections on the same day and said administration was heavily defeated.* The second was that a lot of Labour supporters in South Wales were unhappy at Rhodri Morgan being blocked as Welsh leader in favour of Alun Michael and decided to cast protest votes.

*The new Plaid administration turned out to be just about the worst sort of officer-led council possible and was in turn ousted in a massive landslide in 2003.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #57 on: September 04, 2014, 08:23:23 AM »

But not really as no one had ever heard of that guy.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #58 on: September 10, 2014, 06:18:53 PM »

Bercow is unpopular with many of his former colleagues on the Conservative benches, but with who else, exactly? He was supposed to be 'unpopular' in his constituency in 2010 too and clearly wasn't. I think most people who care about such things - even if they don't like him - regard him as an unusually effective Speaker.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #59 on: September 11, 2014, 10:15:14 AM »

Some form of regional government makes sense, but it's fairly clear that the regions should not be the current official ones (which are essentially statistical entities). Possibly it would make sense to dust off the Redcliffe-Maud report and then adjust accordingly.

Proposed 'Provinces' of England:



And the proposed local authorities that went with them:



Also proposed were additional authorities for dealing with the particular problems of large metropolitan areas. Yes, it was basically what happens when you let geography geeks design a local government system. The Heath government dropped it like a hot potato, of course.

An alternative would be to accept popular enthusiasm for the traditional counties and to work out small regions based on combinations of these, adjusted for the reality of modern conurbations, etc.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #60 on: September 21, 2014, 12:33:25 PM »

Labour won a majority of seats in England in 2005.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #61 on: September 23, 2014, 05:14:48 PM »

Ah I see things that need to be addressed at some point. But first things first:

North East (based in Durham due to the Newcastle - Sunderland rivalry)

Durham City is also the historical sort-of capital of the region (i.e back when County Durham - when then included random pockets in northern Northumberland - was effectively a semi-independent state under the Prince Bishops) and also has the benefit of not being too far away from Teesside.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #62 on: October 02, 2014, 09:45:46 AM »

Well, you know my motto. Why put off till tomorrow what you can put off till next week?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #63 on: October 03, 2014, 05:22:09 PM »

My suspicion at this point - and it's too early to have anything other than suspicions - is that results in Scotland will look not entirely unlike those of October 1974. Maybe not in terms of details, admittedly.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #64 on: October 05, 2014, 11:31:35 AM »

Labour don't need a landslide in Scotland to do well there in terms of seats; in October '74 the breakdown of votes in Scotland was Labour 36.3, SNP 30.4, Con 24.7, Lib 8.3, but the number of seats won was Labour 41, Con 16, SNP 11, Lib 3. At the 2007 Holyrood election Labour took 37 constituency seats to the SNP's 21 despite polling slightly less votes. Obviously in 2011 the SNP won way more, but that was with a 14pt lead.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2014, 07:21:05 PM »

Survation is trash. By-election bumps might be seen from the more reputable firms o/c, but ask the LibDems for how long those typically last.

(also have to wonder who exactly these 'experts' are and what exactly they've been imbibing, but that's really not important).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #66 on: October 12, 2014, 12:11:21 PM »

I don't normally hold with obsessing with polls this far out from an election*, but a YouGov done at the same time as the Survation poll shows Labour 34, Con 32, UKIP 16, LDem 9. For what that's worth.

*You'd never think it from the way the media covers politics, but the British electorate typically only emerges from its perfectly rational boredom with the political process once the Great Electoral Carnival gets rolling.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #67 on: October 12, 2014, 12:45:08 PM »

Though never forget that every other election is proclaimed to be the least predictable in recent memory.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #68 on: October 12, 2014, 05:45:04 PM »

I was just being playful...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #69 on: October 12, 2014, 05:59:55 PM »

Most parliamentary terms are full of weirdness. The whole Cash for Peerages nonsense, anyone?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #70 on: October 12, 2014, 06:39:18 PM »

A claim that has been made periodically since... what... the 1960s?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #71 on: October 12, 2014, 07:07:19 PM »

To be fair, the way British politics operates has completely changed since the 1960s.

I don't know about completely. One thing that is very similar is the insistence that this particular moment that we're living in now is the most unpredictable time in politics that anyone can remember (etc). Most of what has changed, of course, has changed pretty gradually.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #72 on: October 13, 2014, 09:21:07 AM »

The Greens have gone so far as to threaten legal action. Hilarious.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #73 on: October 15, 2014, 09:51:05 AM »

A Tory win in Taunton would count as a swing to the left...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,833
United Kingdom


« Reply #74 on: October 16, 2014, 01:47:42 PM »

Given that the exit poll at the last GE was more accurate than the campaign period polls, presumably.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 11 queries.