Hillary: I'm not retiring, I'll be back on the "fast track" in a "little while" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 08:06:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Hillary: I'm not retiring, I'll be back on the "fast track" in a "little while" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary: I'm not retiring, I'll be back on the "fast track" in a "little while"  (Read 12891 times)
Lupo
Rookie
**
Posts: 119


« on: January 10, 2013, 10:19:39 PM »

It would be sad if our first female President was one who got their on the coattails of her husband.
Logged
Lupo
Rookie
**
Posts: 119


« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2013, 09:33:50 PM »

It would be sad if our first female President was one who got their on the coattails of her husband.
More like she manages to become our first female President DESPITE everything that's gone on with her husband. She really became beloved in New York on her own, and then all her work as Secretary of State over the last 4 years.

It would be sad if our first female President was one who got their on the coattails of her husband.

This is such sexist and silly nonsense, that assumes Clinton never accomplished anything on her own. She's already accomplished more than a lot of presidential nominees, including arguably Obama when he won the nomination.

Do you really think she would've been able to run for the U.S. Senate in New York if it wasn't for her husband?
Logged
Lupo
Rookie
**
Posts: 119


« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2013, 09:54:36 PM »

It would be sad if our first female President was one who got their on the coattails of her husband.
More like she manages to become our first female President DESPITE everything that's gone on with her husband. She really became beloved in New York on her own, and then all her work as Secretary of State over the last 4 years.

It would be sad if our first female President was one who got their on the coattails of her husband.

This is such sexist and silly nonsense, that assumes Clinton never accomplished anything on her own. She's already accomplished more than a lot of presidential nominees, including arguably Obama when he won the nomination.

Do you really think she would've been able to run for the U.S. Senate in New York if it wasn't for her husband?


Do you really think the George H.W. Bush and his children would have had successful careers in politics if it wasn't for Prescott?

A ton of politicians owe family for their early accomplishments. Hillary became her own brand a long time ago.

I agree with you.  I just think it would be a shame that such a momentous occurrence would be due significantly to whom she is married.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.